Accelerating twi high speed PWM fans deliver invincible cooling capability.Innovative “Tool free” fan boxes for easy installation of fans.Pioneering “Doble V” heatpipe deployment compresses airflow to increase efficiency under mid to high air pressures.Highly dense and tilted aluminum fins precisely engineered for impeccable cooling performance.Silent 92mm wide range PWM fan operating at only 17dBA on minimum speed.Ĭooler Master Hyper TX3 Evo Specificationsģ Direct contact heat pipes / Aluminum fins.Easily add and optional second fan with quick snap fan brackets to provide cooling performance.3 directs contact heat pipes and a base surface engineered to minimize CPU contact gaps.
For this review we mark these coolers as follow:įeatures and Specifications 1. Let see what Cooler Master did in the cooler segment with this two new models. All we know that the Hyper 212+ was an excellent cooler for price/performance for a few years, today we will see if the Hyper 212 Evo can keep that line and be the new one price/performance cooler of the market.Īll we know to Cooler Master not only for his coolers, we also know than this company made very good cases for rigs as the HAF 932 and big giant HAF X as well as many fan options with and without LEDs on it. We will see the performance comparison between the new Hyper TX3 Evo, Hyper 212 Evo and the classic V6GT. Keep in mind these calculations are provided for demonstration purposes only and may not reflect the actual lab tested C/W rating, but we're pretty close.Today, we will take a look at three (3) CPU coolers from Cooler Master. Overall performance should increase when you install a secondary fan, just make sure to set them in a push/pull configuration. At this speed the fan is still virtually silent.
It should also be noted that we did test this heatsink using only a single fan spinning full speed (2000rpm). However, we don't normally see this sort of increase with such a mild overclock and no voltage increases. In these tests you'll notice that the C/W numbers did change between the default and overclocked tests, which is expected given the rise in CPU temp.
During this test we were able to pump an estimated 114w of heat into the heatsink at 4.2Ghz and the results show it can handle a mild overclock despite the higher than normal CPU temps. We are using the new Sandy Bridge platform for these tests and you will notice that the total heat output is considerably lower than any of our other heatsink tests. These numbers can be used to determine heat capacity, the larger the difference the less efficient the heatsink is. The resulting C/W number is used to rate how efficient a heatsink or waterblock is based on the given heat load. This is why we normally only apply 85% of the total wattage output to our heat calculations. Since this is a real world testing method we need to take into consideration real world variables and estimate tolerances. In our heatsink and waterblock tests we don't really focus on overall load temperatures but rather how well the product can remove heat given a specified heat load.